Liver Injury Residuals — VA Disability Rating (DC 7311)
Diagnostic Code 7311 · 38 CFR §4.114
What Is It?
DC 7311 covers the long-term residual effects of a liver injury — typically from combat trauma such as penetrating wounds or blast injury, from motor vehicle trauma, or from a surgical complication. Acute liver injuries are managed during the initial hospitalization with surgery, embolization, or supportive care; what this code addresses is what persists afterward: scarring that alters liver architecture, areas of necrosis, residual bile leak, and the functional consequences. The important structural point is that DC 7311 carries no percentages of its own. Its rating cell in 38 CFR §4.114 is empty, and the entry reads: "Depending on the specific residuals, separately evaluate as adhesions of peritoneum (diagnostic code 7301), cirrhosis of liver (diagnostic code 7312), and chronic liver disease without cirrhosis (diagnostic code 7345)." The word that matters there is separately — the schedule is not asking the rater to choose one of the three, it is directing evaluation under each that applies. Note that §4.114's opening paragraph bars combining DC 7301 through 7329, 7331, 7342, 7345 through 7350, 7352, and 7355 through 7357 with each other, so where more than one of those codes is warranted a single evaluation is assigned under the predominant disability picture and elevated a step if the overall severity warrants it.
Rating Criteria
| Rating | Criteria |
|---|---|
| See pathways | DC 7311 assigns no percentages of its own — its rating cell in §4.114 is empty. The entry directs: depending on the specific residuals, separately evaluate as adhesions of peritoneum (DC 7301, 80 / 50 / 30 / 10 / 0), cirrhosis of liver (DC 7312, 100 / 60 / 30 / 10 / 0), and chronic liver disease without cirrhosis (DC 7345, 100 / 60 / 40 / 20 / 0). All three sit inside §4.114's non-combination list, so where more than one is warranted the rater assigns one evaluation under the predominant disability picture and elevates it to the next higher evaluation if the overall severity warrants. |
Evidence Needed
The original trauma records — emergency department reports, operative notes from any laparotomy, and the CT or MRI showing the injury — are foundational. Current imaging of the liver documents residual scarring, volume loss, or biliary tree disruption. Because the evaluation is built under DC 7312 and DC 7345, the specific laboratory evidence those codes use is what decides the percentage: DC 7312 is keyed to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and to defined complications — ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal hemorrhage, coagulopathy, portal gastropathy, hepatopulmonary or hepatorenal syndrome — so a current MELD calculation with its inputs (bilirubin, INR, creatinine, sodium) is worth requesting by name. Where adhesions are the residual, DC 7301 is keyed to obstruction episodes, hospitalization, and dietary modification. A hepatology or general surgery consult connects the residuals to the original injury, and service treatment records establishing the in-service injury close the nexus.
C&P Exam Tips
Bring the original trauma records, current imaging, recent liver function tests, and any specialist consults. Because DC 7311 has no table of its own, ask the examiner to characterize the residuals in the terms the destination codes use rather than in general ones — a MELD score rather than "abnormal labs," documented obstruction episodes and hospitalizations rather than "adhesion pain." Describe the functional impact: chronic right-upper-quadrant pain, dietary restrictions, fatigue, medication and alcohol intolerance. List any complications with dates. If more than one of the three destination codes applies, say so, and ask that the decision identify which one it treated as the predominant disability picture.
How to File
File VA Form 21-526EZ listing liver injury residuals under DC 7311, and name the specific residuals you are claiming — adhesions, cirrhosis, chronic liver disease without cirrhosis — because DC 7311 carries no percentage of its own and those are the codes the evaluation is built under. Attach the original trauma records, current imaging, liver function tests including a current MELD score where liver dysfunction is present, and any hepatology or surgery consults.
Common Mistakes
Expecting DC 7311 to pay a percentage on its own — its rating cell is empty and it exists to route the claim to DC 7301, DC 7312, and DC 7345. Reading the entry as a choice between those three when it says to evaluate separately as each applies. Filing without current imaging and without the specific measures the destination codes use, above all a current MELD score where liver dysfunction is the residual. Overlooking §4.114's non-combination rule, which means several qualifying codes produce one evaluation under the predominant picture, elevated a step where warranted — not a stack.
Frequently Asked Questions
My liver injury healed completely — can I still get a rating?
A truly healed injury with normal labs, normal imaging, and no functional impact rates at 0 percent under whichever destination code fits. A 0 percent rating still preserves service connection, which matters: if complications develop years later, the connection is already established and the evaluation can be increased without re-fighting the nexus. Keep the 0 percent rating on the record.
How does the VA decide between DC 7312 and DC 7345?
DC 7312 is cirrhosis of the liver, keyed to the MELD score and to defined complications — ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal hemorrhage, coagulopathy, portal gastropathy, hepatopulmonary or hepatorenal syndrome. DC 7345 is chronic liver disease without cirrhosis. Which applies is a clinical question answered by imaging, biopsy where performed, and the MELD calculation, not a rating preference. Both sit inside §4.114's non-combination list, so if more than one warrants an evaluation the rater assigns a single one under the predominant disability picture and elevates it a step if the overall severity warrants.
Can post-traumatic liver scarring lead to cancer years later?
Chronic liver scarring and inflammation are documented risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma. A veteran with service-connected liver injury residuals who later develops liver cancer can pursue secondary service connection; §4.114 rates malignant neoplasms of the digestive system under DC 7343 at 100 percent, with a Note governing what happens after treatment ends. The nexus opinion typically runs through the scarring as the predisposing condition.